You are not logged in. Viewing as Guest
- YoWorld Forums > YoWorld Discussions > Create a Monthly Timed Re-release ....that players vote on.
Nina (2904106) wrote:I understand people who don't want re-releases of 2008 costumes, 2009 bow, any collectible etc. Many enjoy saving up for goals, and so do I.
But is someone going to be upset about re-releases of these, for example?
Just gave a few examples for items that are useful for decorators. Maybe few people paid a high price for some of them in the past, but that was the buyer's choice.
I just think that re-releasing some furniture items (Not collectibles and not 2008/2009 items) will have more benefits than not re-releasing them. There would be still plenty of items to collect, buy/sell, set as a goal...
Joseph YRW (185793131) wrote:Vivica (13404458) wrote:Joseph YRW (185793131) wrote:You guys should also think about this, BVG already officially stated any item people had a fair chance at getting wont be re-released, is they went back on this promis then nothing BVG ever says will ever be official to anyone again
They can revise is, they can change it completely. It's their game and they can do whatever they want with it.
I didn't say they couldnt, but nothing they say will ever be considired official and trust worthy again. Many trash talk zynga because of all the re-releases. Imagine spending millions of coins and spending so much time looking for items from the 2013 themes, just to have them re-released the next day. Just because you wont lose anything doesn't mean everyone else wont. I can live without the 2013 themes, if I want something I will look and save up for it instead of asking for them to be re-released so i can get easy access to them
Nina (2904106) wrote:I understand people who don't want re-releases of 2008 costumes, 2009 bow, any collectible etc. Many enjoy saving up for goals, and so do I.
But is someone going to be upset about re-releases of these, for example?
Just gave a few examples for items that are useful for decorators. Maybe few people paid a high price for some of them in the past, but that was the buyer's choice.
I just think that re-releasing some furniture items (Not collectibles and not 2008/2009 items) will have more benefits than not re-releasing them. There would be still plenty of items to collect, buy/sell, set as a goal...
Nina (2904106) wrote:I understand people who don't want re-releases of 2008 costumes, 2009 bow, any collectible etc. Many enjoy saving up for goals, and so do I.
But is someone going to be upset about re-releases of these, for example?
Just gave a few examples for items that are useful for decorators. Maybe few people paid a high price for some of them in the past, but that was the buyer's choice.
I just think that re-releasing some furniture items (Not collectibles and not 2008/2009 items) will have more benefits than not re-releasing them. There would be still plenty of items to collect, buy/sell, set as a goal...
Nina (2904106) wrote:I understand people who don't want re-releases of 2008 costumes, 2009 bow, any collectible etc. Many enjoy saving up for goals, and so do I.
But is someone going to be upset about re-releases of these, for example?
Just gave a few examples for items that are useful for decorators. Maybe few people paid a high price for some of them in the past, but that was the buyer's choice.
I just think that re-releasing some furniture items (Not collectibles and not 2008/2009 items) will have more benefits than not re-releasing them. There would be still plenty of items to collect, buy/sell, set as a goal...
Joseph YRW (185793131) wrote:Nina (2904106) wrote:I understand people who don't want re-releases of 2008 costumes, 2009 bow, any collectible etc. Many enjoy saving up for goals, and so do I.
But is someone going to be upset about re-releases of these, for example?
Just gave a few examples for items that are useful for decorators. Maybe few people paid a high price for some of them in the past, but that was the buyer's choice.
I just think that re-releasing some furniture items (Not collectibles and not 2008/2009 items) will have more benefits than not re-releasing them. There would be still plenty of items to collect, buy/sell, set as a goal...
Yes it was the buyers choice to pay high for those items because they trust that they wont be released again. If bvg breaks their promis and releases items that everyone had a fair chance at well that leaves the door open for 2008 costumes to also be re-released even if they say they wont
Willow (13350872) wrote:Joseph YRW (185793131) wrote:Nina (2904106) wrote:I understand people who don't want re-releases of 2008 costumes, 2009 bow, any collectible etc. Many enjoy saving up for goals, and so do I.
But is someone going to be upset about re-releases of these, for example?
Just gave a few examples for items that are useful for decorators. Maybe few people paid a high price for some of them in the past, but that was the buyer's choice.
I just think that re-releasing some furniture items (Not collectibles and not 2008/2009 items) will have more benefits than not re-releasing them. There would be still plenty of items to collect, buy/sell, set as a goal...
Yes it was the buyers choice to pay high for those items because they trust that they wont be released again. If bvg breaks their promis and releases items that everyone had a fair chance at well that leaves the door open for 2008 costumes to also be re-released even if they say they wont
They'd have all kinds of new people to make up for any that might quit. Which may not happen anyways but if they would bring this stuff back it could also open up the door for new players to buy yocash.
PaintedTears (123584297) wrote:Work for ur ----. Stop begging for it.
Mair (107263339) wrote:" Actually, I will lose A LOT... just like I've lost a lot in the past. I lost a lot on Animal Reserve, Groovy, High School, Mafia/Police, etc etc... I lost millions. I'd lose millions more if they re-release the 2013 items. I'd lose everything if they re-released everything from the beginning of time...
As far as pixel wealth goes, anyways. But I'd still have the items that I enjoy and others would be able to enjoy them too. "
And many of us fit this statement. We are all players from 2008- 2009 we all have Collectibles, stuff from one day sales, stuff that are millions stuff that were short released. ......... We won't lose the items, the divide can be resolved and we can all look forward to what BVG now does with the game!
Joseph YRW (185793131) wrote: (13350872)"]Joseph YRW (185793131) wrote:Nina (2904106) wrote:I understand people who don't want re-releases of 2008 costumes, 2009 bow, any collectible etc. Many enjoy saving up for goals, and so do I.
But is someone going to be upset about re-releases of these, for example?
Just gave a few examples for items that are useful for decorators. Maybe few people paid a high price for some of them in the past, but that was the buyer's choice.
I just think that re-releasing some furniture items (Not collectibles and not 2008/2009 items) will have more benefits than not re-releasing them. There would be still plenty of items to collect, buy/sell, set as a goal...
Yes it was the buyers choice to pay high for those items because they trust that they wont be released again. If bvg breaks their promis and releases items that everyone had a fair chance at well that leaves the door open for 2008 costumes to also be re-released even if they say they wont
They'd have all kinds of new people to make up for any that might quit. Which may not happen anyways but if they would bring this stuff back it could also open up the door for new players to buy yocash.
Vivica (13404458) wrote:I honestly, honestly, don't want re-releases. I have NEVER wanted re-releases...
HOWEVER... I don't think it's fair to give some people what they want (Celtic Cross - I don't CARE how long it was in stores for. It was still an officially released item.) and not others... 2013 was NOT a fair year because A LOT of people quit due to the events being down... and to all the glitches and technical issues in game that prevented A LOT of people from even logging in or buying anything. 2013 was a BROKEN year and it should DEFINITELY be re-released since they've re-released Celtic Cross.
It is only fair.
Vivica (13404458) wrote:I honestly, honestly, don't want re-releases. I have NEVER wanted re-releases...
HOWEVER... I don't think it's fair to give some people what they want (Celtic Cross - I don't CARE how long it was in stores for. It was still an officially released item.) and not others... 2013 was NOT a fair year because A LOT of people quit due to the events being down... and to all the glitches and technical issues in game that prevented A LOT of people from even logging in or buying anything. 2013 was a BROKEN year and it should DEFINITELY be re-released since they've re-released Celtic Cross.
It is only fair.
Willow (13350872) wrote:
Where there's a will there's a way No actually you might be surprised at how many of the new players would buy yocash. If they'd put all zynga items in one store like viv suggested. I'll bet not only tons of older players that never had a chance to get those items plus a ton of newer players would all buy yocash. Then bvg could start with their own collectibles and keep those as a no re-release.
Mair (107263339) wrote:Vivica (13404458) wrote:I honestly, honestly, don't want re-releases. I have NEVER wanted re-releases...
HOWEVER... I don't think it's fair to give some people what they want (Celtic Cross - I don't CARE how long it was in stores for. It was still an officially released item.) and not others... 2013 was NOT a fair year because A LOT of people quit due to the events being down... and to all the glitches and technical issues in game that prevented A LOT of people from even logging in or buying anything. 2013 was a BROKEN year and it should DEFINITELY be re-released since they've re-released Celtic Cross.
It is only fair.
I hear you, that is why my first statement was, "since you now re-released in store items. might as well release them all!"
Joseph YRW (185793131) wrote:Mair (107263339) wrote:" Actually, I will lose A LOT... just like I've lost a lot in the past. I lost a lot on Animal Reserve, Groovy, High School, Mafia/Police, etc etc... I lost millions. I'd lose millions more if they re-release the 2013 items. I'd lose everything if they re-released everything from the beginning of time...
As far as pixel wealth goes, anyways. But I'd still have the items that I enjoy and others would be able to enjoy them too. "
And many of us fit this statement. We are all players from 2008- 2009 we all have Collectibles, stuff from one day sales, stuff that are millions stuff that were short released. ......... We won't lose the items, the divide can be resolved and we can all look forward to what BVG now does with the game!
People who payed in 2013 had just as much of a chance at the themes as a player that played in 2008 had at the 2008 costumes
Willow (13350872) wrote:Mair (107263339) wrote:Vivica (13404458) wrote:I honestly, honestly, don't want re-releases. I have NEVER wanted re-releases...
HOWEVER... I don't think it's fair to give some people what they want (Celtic Cross - I don't CARE how long it was in stores for. It was still an officially released item.) and not others... 2013 was NOT a fair year because A LOT of people quit due to the events being down... and to all the glitches and technical issues in game that prevented A LOT of people from even logging in or buying anything. 2013 was a BROKEN year and it should DEFINITELY be re-released since they've re-released Celtic Cross.
It is only fair.
I hear you, that is why my first statement was, "since you now re-released in store items. might as well release them all!"
Yep..I agree with both of you