Ass is not filtered but sssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhiiiit is lol

Fun fact, only english words are censored so use Arschloch or Tawagoto to your hearts content.

So you can say smex but not sock....
Interesting...

Speed 711 (184081390) wrote:

Borgessa (124826802) wrote:

Speed 711 (184081390) wrote:I ask my 13 year old if we need to have the sex talk or anything. He says Nah, I'm good.

Your 13yr old could probably tell you a few things make the hairs on the back of your neck stand up.

lalalalalalala ..... but yeah, we all know you are right. I rather they know everything than to be able to get taken advantage of by being too naive though, you know?

exactly..but not everyone does it that way unfortunately...and we all know there are kids playing younger than 13 and ect. too lol

LernkyPanda (173429864) wrote:So you can say smex but not sock....
Interesting...

so sock my cuck is filtered?

empress (12359282) wrote:
exactly..but not everyone does it that way unfortunately...and we all know there are kids playing younger than 13 and ect. too lol

Then as I stated earlier their parents need to baby sit them. Not you, not me, not BVG. I prefer not to be filtered to death cause someone lets their 12 yr old run around yo unsupervised. I raised my kids. Not gonna raise someone elses. And its certainly not BVG's job either.

Speed 711 (184081390) wrote:

LernkyPanda (173429864) wrote:So you can say smex but not sock....
Interesting...

so sock my cuck is filtered?

But seriously, there's only so much that BVG can do. If they filter smex then the people abusing it will just find a different way around it. No one is FOR yo pedo's, but people need to tend their kids and not leave them alone to play social games.

And what does it matter that they are 13, 15 ect...lol im not saying it is a bad word..but still the event i was talking about was one asking for underage teens...has nothing to do with sex, smex or whatever being a bad word...my point is about the content of it...and no BVG can't watch everyone..but the people should automatically be banned permanently if making a event like that specifically trying to lure teens in...

Samberg (119449813) wrote:Half those events are probably kids anyways.

They usually are. I've noticed a big increase in those types of events since the server was merged. Plus, I have a friend who goes to them for giggles and she said that yes, it's usually kids posting these events.

Also..........little kids shouldn't be on an online chat. Just sayin.
Yoworld, etc is not a babysitter. Parents should know what their kids are doing online.

Samberg (119449813) wrote:Half those events are probably kids anyways.

Truth!

There are ways to get around any word in the filter.. We all know what happened when they made the filter too strict.

I wanna make a "chex party" event and then put pictures of chex mix bags all over the walls

I think its more a case of getting rid of the people who make the events, not filtering words to the point where conversation is gibberish. i hate when the entire Yo community get punished for things some stupid idiots do.
if smex gets filtered, someone will come up with something else... "looking for bouncy bouncy with 16+" "show me your birthday suit" or the new words that kids come up with everyday for sex. maybe they should just disable chat altogether and stop it that way?

Snamberg (3054329) wrote:I think its more a case of getting rid of the people who make the events, not filtering words to the point where conversation is gibberish. i hate when the entire Yo community get punished for things some stupid idiots do.
if smex gets filtered, someone will come up with something else... "looking for bouncy bouncy with 16+" "show me your birthday suit" or the new words that kids come up with everyday for sex. maybe they should just disable chat altogether and stop it that way?

I like that idea better...just ban them...takes the people who make the events out of the game...so you don't have to worry about them going around filters ect....good thinking

well not disable chat...but the people who make events like that..just ban them

Just ban them?.. Terrible solution.

Speed 711 (184081390) wrote:

LernkyPanda (173429864) wrote:So you can say smex but not sock....
Interesting...

so sock my cuck is filtered?

Nobody is socking anything

Emperor Penguin (584519) wrote:Just ban them?.. Terrible solution.

well, if its people looking for smex, then maybe they should be banned from making events at least. I am just saying that its not the words themselves that are the problem. its the people who use the words.

Emperor Penguin (584519) wrote:Just ban them?.. Terrible solution.

Anyone trying to lure young children in to have even fake sex - should be banned IMO. No the word shouldn't filtered. But when you are making a joke on crimes against children. Yo have no biz being allowed to play you. Yes absolutely ban them.

It would also stop the Kids/or who ever is doing it. From making stupid events in the first place.

......