Meleagris (122131215) wrote:

Karma YED (167876742) wrote:LOL, I do not believe I mentioned anyone, did I? But, if the shoe fits...

No you just quoted me which in and of itself is mentioning me, or maybe you don't comprehend that!

Oh look, I finally found that FOES tab..... thank goodness

Karma YED (167876742) wrote:

Meleagris (122131215) wrote:

Karma YED (167876742) wrote:LOL, I do not believe I mentioned anyone, did I? But, if the shoe fits...

No you just quoted me which in and of itself is mentioning me, or maybe you don't comprehend that!

Oh look, I finally found that FOES tab..... thank goodness

No problem, I don't really find it necessary because I can handle whatever anyone has to say.

LOL and to think in this thread I was a friend, how quickly one turns:

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9940&start=140

Karma YED (167876742) wrote:

LisaTM (10095126) wrote:

Meleagris (122131215) wrote:I don't think anyone is talking about leaving all furniture from every theme in store, just some of the most useful decoration items like the grass squares. And I think you would be surprised at how many decorators there are out there. I think a majority of the money made in this game comes from those who are interested in decorating and not those interested in clothes, collecting or the buy and sell aspect. Eventually BVG will see if more yc is spent on furniture compared to spent on clothes, if they don't already have that information. Decorators tend to be a more quiet bunch I think.

This! ^ Lots of us decorate but don't show off our work here, or anyplace for that matter. I used to spend lots on furniture. I love clothing as well, but the main reason I've been playing this long is the decorating. I have some houses I love but we can't change the floors on the outdoor areas and those grass patches were the best! And those wall panels, etc. They were staples for decorators.

Put your work out, for everyone to see. Maybe than some people will understand what we are so upset about.

Robot (185180932) wrote:Well... Luckily this thread is only some people's delusion!



This can be beaten and reincarnated til it's wisher's and hopefuls are blue in the face.
However, BVG put an intentional end to this debate long before it even restarted.

Deaf ears

Veronica, Releasing those things would not help the game. YOu know there are still many unreleased items they could release. Why aren't you asking for those things? I have read your rationale but I still do not understand. Sorry. I cannot support such a move by BigV.

Robot (185180932) wrote:Well... Luckily this thread is only some people's delusion!



This can be beaten and reincarnated til it's wisher's and hopefuls are blue in the face.
However, BVG put an intentional end to this debate long before it even restarted.

But a NO means well maybe YES ...

Looking at the whole pic. we got till now, people stand roughly 50% - %50 about this issue.

The problem is doing it either way means letting the other half down. I guess there should be a fair mid point figured out somehow.

Veronica (122961678) wrote:Looking at the whole pic. we got till now, people stand roughly 50% - %50 about this issue.

The problem is doing it either way means letting the other half down. I guess there should be a fair mid point figured out somehow.

Umm, ok, why not? 23 8%
Definitely YES 119 40%
I'm ok with either 42 14%
Definitely NO 117

Not really, bc when u see Ummm OK (yes) why not? That's a yes so u have 142 votes for yes
and 117 for no but u can split the ok with either in 1/2 and give each 21 votes

so in total 163 for YES 138 for NO

TeddyP I N K (110813986) wrote:

Veronica (122961678) wrote:Looking at the whole pic. we got till now, people stand roughly 50% - %50 about this issue.

The problem is doing it either way means letting the other half down. I guess there should be a fair mid point figured out somehow.

Umm, ok, why not? 23 8%
Definitely YES 119 40%
I'm ok with either 42 14%
Definitely NO 117

Not really, bc when u see Ummm OK (yes) why not? That's a yes so u have 142 votes for yes
and 117 for no but u can split the ok with either in 1/2 and give each 21 votes

so in total 163 for YES 138 for NO

But there was no "Umm, ok, why?" which would be interpreted as a No ... I guess you didn't read my post on how unscientific this poll is ...

That doesn't matter ladies. Umm no umm yes umm idk we can add as many as we want. Just the yes and no choices already show it all. And the other choices show those who are not necessarily against it.

A few ppl more a few ppl less I said ROUGHLY its fifty fifty. No need to discuss exact numbers.

Veronica (122961678) wrote:That doesn't matter ladies. Umm no umm yes umm idk we can add as many as we want. Just the yes and no choices already show it all. And the other choices show those who are not necessarily against it.

A few ppl more a few ppl less I said ROUGHLY its fifty fifty. No need to discuss exact numbers.

Yes it's pretty much even and that doesn't surprise me, although from your earlier comments it seems that you would think it surprises BVG.

Veronica (122961678) wrote:Looking at the whole pic. we got till now, people stand roughly 50% - %50 about this issue.

The problem is doing it either way means letting the other half down. I guess there should be a fair mid point figured out somehow.

What about the fact that BigV said they are not releasing those things?

The no that really counts is what bvg said and still people won't take that for an answer smdh

Meleagris (122131215) wrote: (122961678)"]

Meleagris (122131215) wrote:

yoworld.com wrote:Q: Will you be re-releasing specific items?

A: Unlikely, but we may create new variations of them.

Gary wrote:If the item was officially released previously and everyone had the opportunity to get it, then no. We know item rarity and value is very important to the players, and we respect that.

Viking John wrote:Hey everyone!

As it's been stated a few times in this thread quoting Gary's interview with YoRehab, if any item has officially been released by Zynga in the past we will not be putting it back into the game. Accidental releases such as the Menorah Hat are different, as they weren't an official release.

All of your 08 and 09 costumes, retro specks, and all the other valuable items that have been released before are not going to be re-released. As Gary mentioned, we understand the value of rare items and want to keep it that way.

If you see people posting 'rumor' threads about releases coming tomorrow or next week, if it's not a post from one of us then it's exactly that, a rumor!

I hope this helps clear things up for everyone!

Here is the progression of statements made by BVG concerning rereleases, if I missed any it would be great if someone could post it.

Yes but again, as Amber stated thousand times, these statements were made before they could tell there were also so many people who actually want re-releases. It is normal that they must have thought all yoworld players like it this way since nobody stated an opposite opinion before. So they said, ""We know item rarity and value is very important to the players, and we respect that.""

Well, then how about those more than half of the players who don't care about item rarity and just want to play? Looks like they never thought about it.

Now what we are trying to do is, actually, kindly asking them to re-evaluate this issue. There is nothing wrong with asking / expressing what we would like.

Some people have always stated they wanted rereleases, that is nothing new. BVG made those statements knowing that rereleases have been requested in the past and probably would continue to be requested. Why you would think BVG thought all yoworld players didn't like rereleases I have no idea and why you think no one has ever been pro rerelease and expressed it I also have no idea. In the old forums there were many who were pro rerelease and expressed it.

Even in my own household we are split on this matter, some against rerelease and some for it. But none of us are too worried either way because we will be fine no matter what happens.

But again if you think that this is the first thread to ever be pro rerelease or have pro rerelease statements in it I have to think that you haven't been paying much attention the last year and a half. I think that BVG is aware that many are pro rerelease and has always been aware of that even when they made those statements, because it has been obvious for a long time. There were so many debate threads in the old forum debating this issue back and forth that they had plenty opportunity to see the debate.

And you supposedly are not asking for all out rerelease but only of the "ghost themes". Well would it be fair if only those were rereleased and not other themes that others want rereleased? I don't think so.[/quote]

Well said Mele

Willow (13350872) wrote:
Well said Mele

You and your quotes you got me saying what I said and what Veronica said, you got them all messed up, lol, you might need private lessons on this ... rofl.

Meleagris (122131215) wrote:

yoworld.com wrote:Q: Will you be re-releasing specific items?

A: Unlikely, but we may create new variations of them.

Gary wrote:If the item was officially released previously and everyone had the opportunity to get it, then no. We know item rarity and value is very important to the players, and we respect that.

Viking John wrote:Hey everyone!

As it's been stated a few times in this thread quoting Gary's interview with YoRehab, if any item has officially been released by Zynga in the past we will not be putting it back into the game. Accidental releases such as the Menorah Hat are different, as they weren't an official release.

All of your 08 and 09 costumes, retro specks, and all the other valuable items that have been released before are not going to be re-released. As Gary mentioned, we understand the value of rare items and want to keep it that way.

If you see people posting 'rumor' threads about releases coming tomorrow or next week, if it's not a post from one of us then it's exactly that, a rumor!

I hope this helps clear things up for everyone!

Here is the progression of statements made by BVG concerning rereleases, if I missed any it would be great if someone could post it.

Veronica (122961678) wrote:Yes but again, as Amber stated thousand times, these statements were made before they could tell there were also so many people who actually want re-releases. It is normal that they must have thought all yoworld players like it this way since nobody stated an opposite opinion before. So they said, ""We know item rarity and value is very important to the players, and we respect that.""

Well, then how about those more than half of the players who don't care about item rarity and just want to play? Looks like they never thought about it.

Now what we are trying to do is, actually, kindly asking them to re-evaluate this issue. There is nothing wrong with asking / expressing what we would like.

Meleagris (122131215) wrote:Some people have always stated they wanted rereleases, that is nothing new. BVG made those statements knowing that rereleases have been requested in the past and probably would continue to be requested. Why you would think BVG thought all yoworld players didn't like rereleases I have no idea and why you think no one has ever been pro rerelease and expressed it I also have no idea. In the old forums there were many who were pro rerelease and expressed it.

Even in my own household we are split on this matter, some against rerelease and some for it. But none of us are too worried either way because we will be fine no matter what happens.

But again if you think that this is the first thread to ever be pro rerelease or have pro rerelease statements in it I have to think that you haven't been paying much attention the last year and a half. I think that BVG is aware that many are pro rerelease and has always been aware of that even when they made those statements, because it has been obvious for a long time. There were so many debate threads in the old forum debating this issue back and forth that they had plenty opportunity to see the debate.

And you supposedly are not asking for all out rerelease but only of the "ghost themes". Well would it be fair if only those were rereleased and not other themes that others want rereleased? I don't think so.

Now this is the way to do quotes ... hahaha, so just pm me when you are ready for your lessons ... rofl.

TeddyP I N K (110813986) wrote:

Veronica (122961678) wrote:Looking at the whole pic. we got till now, people stand roughly 50% - %50 about this issue.

The problem is doing it either way means letting the other half down. I guess there should be a fair mid point figured out somehow.

Umm, ok, why not? 23 8%
Definitely YES 119 40%
I'm ok with either 42 14%
Definitely NO 117

Not really, bc when u see Ummm OK (yes) why not? That's a yes so u have 142 votes for yes
and 117 for no but u can split the ok with either in 1/2 and give each 21 votes

so in total 163 for YES 138 for NO

Not a fair poll anyway. TWO choices... is all that was needed. Simple Yes or No.

The way the poll is set up... is 3 possible choices for a Yes... and one option for a No. lol

I agree that the items that are in the stores should be released. Not to bring back older items. This way we can get more people to play the game and buy yocash. I have been playing since 2009 I would love to get back the halloween makeup mask, but they are not in the store so those will not be released to bad for me I missed it. But items that you can still see, I don't see a problem with opening them for sale for a short time, then removing them totally from game. I am just talking about items that are new and shadowed not ones that Zynga re released.

Meleagris (122131215) wrote:

TeddyP I N K (110813986) wrote:

Veronica (122961678) wrote:Looking at the whole pic. we got till now, people stand roughly 50% - %50 about this issue.

The problem is doing it either way means letting the other half down. I guess there should be a fair mid point figured out somehow.

Umm, ok, why not? 23 8%
Definitely YES 119 40%
I'm ok with either 42 14%
Definitely NO 117

Not really, bc when u see Ummm OK (yes) why not? That's a yes so u have 142 votes for yes
and 117 for no but u can split the ok with either in 1/2 and give each 21 votes

so in total 163 for YES 138 for NO

But there was no "Umm, ok, why?" which would be interpreted as a No ... I guess you didn't read my post on how unscientific this poll is ...

Veronica, I do believe that the poll may not be scientific, but it reflects how most people feel. I do think they can read and voted accordingly.. just sayin

I don't know who said the poll was scientific in the first place? It is just a poll. There are 2 main choices YES and NO. Everyone voted, voted according to how they think & feel about the issue.

Yes, I think BVG might not be aware of that there was a this precise opinion difference among players that clearly more&less divides them in to 2 groups before they said there won't be any re-releases.

I want to think this way because if I think they already knew it, they wouldn't say
""We know item rarity and value is very important to the players, and we respect that.""

If I think the other way, then how should I evaluate this ? Does that mean cleary they already chose a side and they don't respect the other half?
If I arrive at this result, then there would be no point for the half of the yoworld players to keep playing a game where they are not respected or cared by the company, left out...

As said earlier, deciding not to re-release at all or to re-release all at this point is purely letting the other half down. There SHOULD be a mid point.

Such as may be they can create an official poll and people can choose a few most wanted themes to be re-released and the rest will stay closed. Just a suggestion.