I wish they would just re-release everything to stop all the threads, fighting over this issue

yoBEponihEko (105418813) wrote:I wish they would just re-release everything to stop all the threads, fighting over this issue

I never want to hear the words again!!! I dont want re releases but right now, i just want it all to stop!!

yoBEponihEko (105418813) wrote:I wish they would just re-release everything to stop all the threads, fighting over this issue

Then there would be other threads such as "i am disappointed BVG" / "I quit" / "I lost tons of profit" etc etc watch the drama if that happens.

I say again there needs to be a mid point where everyone would be ok with and neither sides being completely left out / let down.

Tiger Lily (128332896) wrote:Looking at the whole pic. we got till now, people stand roughly 50% - %50 about this issue.

The problem is doing it either way means letting the other half down. I guess there should be a fair mid point figured out somehow.

Umm, ok, why not? 23 8%
Definitely YES 119 40%
I'm ok with either 42 14%
Definitely NO 117

Not really, bc when u see Ummm OK (yes) why not? That's a yes so u have 142 votes for yes
and 117 for no but u can split the ok with either in 1/2 and give each 21 votes

so in total 163 for YES 138 for NO[/quote]

Not a fair poll anyway. TWO choices... is all that was needed. Simple Yes or No.

The way the poll is set up... is 3 possible choices for a Yes... and one option for a No. lol[/quote]

I agree.

This poll was pretty one-sided.

Veronica (122961678) wrote:As said earlier, deciding not to re-release at all or to re-release all at this point is purely letting the other half down. There SHOULD be a mid point.

Sometimes there can't be a middle ground and this is one of those times ... either they decide to rerelease some/all or they decide not to rerelease. You can't both rerelease and not rerelease. It's like you can't have your cake and eat it also.

And as I said before I'm a decorator and item rarety means some but not all, reason being is that if stuff was always in store and never left then my work could be easily copied and duplicated. You have a nice piano museum, if all items were in store and left in store then there could be tons of piano museums and yours would not be near as impressive as it is.

If BVG starts rereleasing this or that it will be a never ending requests for rereleases. Either that or they just need to put all back in store and keep all in store. Is that what you want? So there could be hundreds of piano museums?

...and...this thread almost died.

Veronica (122961678) wrote:

yoBEponihEko (105418813) wrote:I wish they would just re-release everything to stop all the threads, fighting over this issue

Then there would be other threads such as "i am disappointed BVG" / "I quit" / "I lost tons of profit" etc etc watch the drama if that happens.

I say again there needs to be a mid point where everyone would be ok with and neither sides being completely left out / let down.

And there has been rereleases, plenty of them, it's time to stop or else it will continue on and on and on.

Veronica (122961678) wrote:

yoBEponihEko (105418813) wrote:I wish they would just re-release everything to stop all the threads, fighting over this issue

Then there would be other threads such as "i am disappointed BVG" / "I quit" / "I lost tons of profit" etc etc watch the drama if that happens.

I say again there needs to be a mid point where everyone would be ok with and neither sides being completely left out / let down.

watch the drama if they release these items...

Voldesnort (3054329) wrote:

yoBEponihEko (105418813) wrote:I wish they would just re-release everything to stop all the threads, fighting over this issue

I never want to hear the words again!!! I dont want re releases but right now, i just want it all to stop!!

Don't go getting all HULKY on us ... rofl!

I cant't believe this thread got bumped.. again. Let it die.

I can't see a single thing that has been achieved by it. Well, thats not totally true, but its probably not what was originally intended.

*smh*

Meleagris (122131215) wrote:

Veronica (122961678) wrote:As said earlier, deciding not to re-release at all or to re-release all at this point is purely letting the other half down. There SHOULD be a mid point.

Sometimes there can't be a middle ground and this is one of those times ... either they decide to rerelease some/all or they decide not to rerelease. You can't both rerelease and not rerelease. It's like you can't have your cake and eat it also.

And as I said before I'm a decorator and item rarety means some but not all, reason being is that if stuff was always in store and never left then my work could be easily copied and duplicated. You have a nice piano museum, if all items were in store and left in store then there could be tons of piano museums and yours would not be near as impressive as it is.

If BVG starts rereleasing this or that it will be a never ending requests for rereleases. Either that or they just need to put all back in store and keep all in store. Is that what you want? So there could be hundreds of piano museums?

I think she has stated thats what she wants. Its true though, that would also make her piano "museum" nothing really special at all.

You are using the art of twisting words, and I say what I truly want to express.

My piano museum is only special to me, I didn't make it to impress anyone. I would be happy if more people had those. Re-release my 08 witch today, I will be fine about it. I truly have no problem what I have becomes available to others who don't.

This is a game and having a so-called "rare" expensive item and seeing not everyone can have it doesn't make me feel good inside nor it makes me feel special. Actually, interesting but, it makes me feel kind of bad wearing it around poorer players.

Don Logan (148000103) wrote:

Tiger Lily (128332896) wrote:Looking at the whole pic. we got till now, people stand roughly 50% - %50 about this issue.

The problem is doing it either way means letting the other half down. I guess there should be a fair mid point figured out somehow.

Umm, ok, why not? 23 8%
Definitely YES 119 40%
I'm ok with either 42 14%
Definitely NO 117

Not really, bc when u see Ummm OK (yes) why not? That's a yes so u have 142 votes for yes
and 117 for no but u can split the ok with either in 1/2 and give each 21 votes

so in total 163 for YES 138 for NO

Not a fair poll anyway. TWO choices... is all that was needed. Simple Yes or No.

The way the poll is set up... is 3 possible choices for a Yes... and one option for a No. lol[/quote]

I agree.

This poll was pretty one-sided.[/quote]


Yep.

Robot (185180932) wrote:...and...this thread almost died.

25 + 44 = 69
308 - 69 = 239
Cover the other choices with your fingers do something lol
239 people voted YES or NO = 2 choices
121 YES
118 NO

I don't see what's one sided here. Sorry. What I see some people are just being creative on words & sentences just for the sake of defending their side. Yet this is not a fight. At least, I don't see it that way.

Quoting myself

Veronica (122961678) wrote:I don't know who said the poll was scientific in the first place? It is just a poll. There are 2 main choices YES and NO. Everyone voted, voted according to how they think & feel about the issue.

Yes, I think BVG might not be aware of that there was a this precise opinion difference among players that clearly more&less divides them in to 2 groups before they said there won't be any re-releases.

I want to think this way because if I think they already knew it, they wouldn't say
""We know item rarity and value is very important to the players, and we respect that.""

If I think the other way, then how should I evaluate this ? Does that mean cleary they already chose a side and they don't respect the other half?
If I arrive at this result, then there would be no point for the half of the yoworld players to keep playing a game where they are not respected or cared by the company, left out...

As said earlier, deciding not to re-release at all or to re-release all at this point is purely letting the other half down. There SHOULD be a mid point.

Such as may be they can create an official poll and people can choose a few most wanted themes to be re-released and the rest will stay closed. Just a suggestion.

Veronica (122961678) wrote:As said earlier, deciding not to re-release at all or to re-release all at this point is purely letting the other half down. There SHOULD be a mid point.

Such as may be they can create an official poll and people can choose a few most wanted themes to be re-released and the rest will stay closed. Just a suggestion.

Rereleasing more themes even if picked by people isn't a middle ground between rereleasing and not rereleasing. There can't be a middle ground between the two positions because the positions are opposite. Rereleasing more themes even if picked by people is just deciding to rerelease.

Veronica (122961678) wrote:Yes, I think BVG might not be aware of that there was a this precise opinion difference among players that clearly more&less divides them in to 2 groups before they said there won't be any re-releases.

I want to think this way because if I think they already knew it, they wouldn't say
""We know item rarity and value is very important to the players, and we respect that.""

If I think the other way, then how should I evaluate this ? Does that mean cleary they already chose a side and they don't respect the other half?
If I arrive at this result, then there would be no point for the half of the yoworld players to keep playing a game where they are not respected or cared by the company, left out...

One side or the other is going to be disappointed. That is the nature of the beast. If BVG decides to rerelease I'm not going to think they don't respect my side. I'm not going to feel not cared for by BVG. I'm not going to feel left out. Also for sure I'm not going to think there is no point in playing the game. I'm going to understand that there is no middle ground and they have done what they think is best for the game. Sorry if you feel different.

Actually, releasing a few, and leaving the rest closed IS a mid point.

That way, one side will have to accept that some themes will be re-released,
and the other side will have to accept that they can not have all re-released.

Only that way it will be "fair"

When one side completely loses and the other side completely wins, we can't talk about things being fair here at all.

And believe me, if they had decided completely the other way, most of those no'ers would literally scream here on forums and some of them would start to be rude against BVG. Yes, they would feel left out, not cared. May be just not you dear Meleagris.

Sooz (112570178) wrote::roll:

good conclusion Sooz