tink (185739646) wrote:

Pete (2679242) wrote:The title is attention grabbing and serves as a mental trigger compelling the reader to correct what is deemed incorrect their mind. The poll gives the reader the opportunity to correct the perceived wrong. To serve this purpose the title is more effective in a polarized form but does not have a negative influence on the poll results.

The poll, even though the op was biased, is an accurate depiction of peoples standpoint on this issue. If the op was to change the second option to "Re-releases are bad for the game" the poll options would be correct and unbiased, but you may only get one new vote, it would not create a huge difference in the vote results, thus the results are reliable.

i disagree, Re-releases make me cry. i would never post my vote the way it is worded lol.

Miles NBN (181574628) wrote:NO! They wreck the fun of collecting rare items. It also is a big punch in the face for those who made massive amounts for the items which are now worth nothing.

Maria (140783866) wrote:

Adeline (113719515) wrote:Hot Rod put it best. If you want his version, look up his post.
Here is mine. BigV makes the decisions regarding this subject.

By the way, far more than 800 people play this game.

BTW, so you know, I did not make up this number, I got it from App Metrics, Research for iOS, Facebook & Google play or you can always Google YoWorld (formerly YoVille) - Facebook ... - AppData. And look around

MrSee (148390766) wrote:Big Viking Games bought Yoville from Zynga.....they didnt buy the developers programmers or designers....if they were to rerelease items from the old....they would be breaking their own TOS by introducing copy written materials into the game

Out with the OLD.....in with the NEW

Adeline (113719515) wrote:The major premise of this thread is incorrect. Therefore any results from the poll are incorrect.
It is clear not "Everyone likes a good re-release!"

tink (185739646) wrote:i never voted. i just posted comments on the thread. i think Re-releases make me cry. could of been worded differently

Pete (2679242) wrote:

Adeline (113719515) wrote:The major premise of this thread is incorrect. Therefore any results from the poll are incorrect.
It is clear not "Everyone likes a good re-release!"

tink (185739646) wrote:i never voted. i just posted comments on the thread. i think Re-releases make me cry. could of been worded differently

You make a fair point. I have taken your valid comments into consideration and edited the options say, "Re-releases are bad for the game." instead. You may now cast your vote.

Pete (2679242) wrote:

Maria (140783866) wrote:

Adeline (113719515) wrote:Hot Rod put it best. If you want his version, look up his post.
Here is mine. BigV makes the decisions regarding this subject.

By the way, far more than 800 people play this game.

BTW, so you know, I did not make up this number, I got it from App Metrics, Research for iOS, Facebook & Google play or you can always Google YoWorld (formerly YoVille) - Facebook ... - AppData. And look around

I had a look, that's really scary. I hope that more people then that play and there is something wrong with those stats.

I think that Appmtr must not be getting all the details. There were 15000 odd on the facebook community page and I'm sure all of them have played at some stage so I would say appmtr is a bit off.

Marnix (127338688) wrote:

MrSee (148390766) wrote:Big Viking Games bought Yoville from Zynga.....they didnt buy the developers programmers or designers....if they were to rerelease items from the old....they would be breaking their own TOS by introducing copy written materials into the game

Out with the OLD.....in with the NEW

I don't think that is correct, I believe BVG bought all of the game including the old designs (that is why we still have them in game). As we see they did put some older pets in game and were able to because they do have that ability, and I don't think they broke any "copy right" law by doing that. They pulled them because it wasn't their intention to rerelease, not because they had done something they didn't as owner have a legal right to do.

Hot Rod (126579776) wrote:Rereleases are the root of global warming and they make you gassy. On the plus size they can drop your body weight and give you the ability to see the future.

You make the call. Farty and skinny while the earth is destroyed while you wear your Naturewoman, but you already knew that.

MrSee (148390766) wrote:

Marnix (127338688) wrote:

MrSee (148390766) wrote:Big Viking Games bought Yoville from Zynga.....they didnt buy the developers programmers or designers....if they were to rerelease items from the old....they would be breaking their own TOS by introducing copy written materials into the game

Out with the OLD.....in with the NEW

I don't think that is correct, I believe BVG bought all of the game including the old designs (that is why we still have them in game). As we see they did put some older pets in game and were able to because they do have that ability, and I don't think they broke any "copy right" law by doing that. They pulled them because it wasn't their intention to rerelease, not because they had done something they didn't as owner have a legal right to do.

BVG were pretty quick to correct their error.......


Things that make ya go hmmmmmmmm

Marnix (127338688) wrote:I think what really hurt the economy was the cheating not the rereleases. And I think the cheating is what drove the prices of items high because those with unlimitted coins drove up the price of items.

I also think there are a lot more decorators who buy yocash to decorate than those who buy yocash to sell to be able to afford the "rich" items. And there are many decorators who are interested in rereleases so that they can continue to decorate with those items.