Oh my god you guys are cracking me up today ^^^^^^^

Paula (127963301) wrote:

Nyx (12531218) wrote:That necklace was released in June 2010. Seems about reasonable to me for a 4 year old game item that has always been popular to be about that price.

You'd think that would be a most reasonable assumption to any fair minded player. But, nooo. Gimme Gimme Gimme.

While we're at it, I want Yorothy and I want it now. Gimmie Gimmie Gimmie, why should I pay the jacked up price of 25 mill when it was only a coin item to start with. I refuse to buy it but I would like it gifted NOW. I prefer to save my coins.

omg

Paula (127963301) wrote:

Nyx (12531218) wrote:That necklace was released in June 2010. Seems about reasonable to me for a 4 year old game item that has always been popular to be about that price.

You'd think that would be a most reasonable assumption to any fair minded player. But, nooo. Gimme Gimme Gimme.

While we're at it, I want Yorothy and I want it now. Gimmie Gimmie Gimmie, why should I pay the jacked up price of 25 mill when it was only a coin item to start with. I refuse to buy it but I would like it gifted NOW. I prefer to save my coins.

i want the santa motorcycle

Release it all and get it over with. This is the dawn of a new day. At some point, new items will be coveted....Either way, it's still an enjoyable game. I am thankful we are even contemplating this issue after the events of the past year. Feels nostalgic

Why limit ourselves to pixels? Let's think bigger!

I want a new house, a new car (preferably a '67 Impala), my own private jet would be nice too... an inground swimming pool - ooh, the PS4... some games to go with the PS4... and um... a horse.

Paula (127963301) wrote:

Nyx (12531218) wrote:That necklace was released in June 2010. Seems about reasonable to me for a 4 year old game item that has always been popular to be about that price.

You'd think that would be a most reasonable assumption to any fair minded player. But, nooo. Gimme Gimme Gimme.

While we're at it, I want Yorothy and I want it now. Gimmie Gimmie Gimmie, why should I pay the jacked up price of 25 mill when it was only a coin item to start with. I refuse to buy it but I would like it gifted NOW. I prefer to save my coins.

You would think!

You need to put that in your siggy for maximum effectiveness.

Nyx (12531218) wrote:

Paula (127963301) wrote:

Nyx (12531218) wrote:That necklace was released in June 2010. Seems about reasonable to me for a 4 year old game item that has always been popular to be about that price.

You'd think that would be a most reasonable assumption to any fair minded player. But, nooo. Gimme Gimme Gimme.

While we're at it, I want Yorothy and I want it now. Gimmie Gimmie Gimmie, why should I pay the jacked up price of 25 mill when it was only a coin item to start with. I refuse to buy it but I would like it gifted NOW. I prefer to save my coins.

You would think!

You need to put that in your siggy for maximum effectiveness.

OK!

*hint based on what I learned from this thread* keep the part about wanting to save your coins on the down low. And scream "pricejacking!!!1" a few times.

Vivica (13404458) wrote:Why limit ourselves to pixels? Let's think bigger!

I want a new house, a new car (preferably a '67 Impala), my own private jet would be nice too... an inground swimming pool - ooh, the PS4... some games to go with the PS4... and um... a horse.

Now you're talking!!

Barksy (10200239) wrote:Release it all and get it over with. This is the dawn of a new day. At some point, new items will be coveted....Either way, it's still an enjoyable game. I am thankful we are even contemplating this issue after the events of the past year. Feels nostalgic

Hey Barksy, long time no see. Good to see you here.

Vivica (13404458) wrote:Why limit ourselves to pixels? Let's think bigger!

I want a new house, a new car (preferably a '67 Impala), my own private jet would be nice too... an inground swimming pool - ooh, the PS4... some games to go with the PS4... and um... a horse.

No...

Vivica (13404458) wrote:

Paula (127963301) wrote:

Nyx (12531218) wrote:That necklace was released in June 2010. Seems about reasonable to me for a 4 year old game item that has always been popular to be about that price.

You'd think that would be a most reasonable assumption to any fair minded player. But, nooo. Gimme Gimme Gimme.

While we're at it, I want Yorothy and I want it now. Gimmie Gimmie Gimmie, why should I pay the jacked up price of 25 mill when it was only a coin item to start with. I refuse to buy it but I would like it gifted NOW. I prefer to save my coins.

omg

is that the halloween yorothy?

Willow (13350872) wrote:

Vivica (13404458) wrote:Why limit ourselves to pixels? Let's think bigger!

I want a new house, a new car (preferably a '67 Impala), my own private jet would be nice too... an inground swimming pool - ooh, the PS4... some games to go with the PS4... and um... a horse.

No...

Hot Rod (126579776) wrote:

Hahahaha...poor horse anyhoe.

tink (185739646) wrote:
is that the halloween yorothy?

Oh Noes....original 08 Yoros only! Please and thankyou!

Adeline (113719515) wrote:Personally, I think people are kind of sick of this type of thread.

I don't know if people are sick of this type of thread, lots of people seem to post on them and you have posted a lot here.

Adeline (113719515) wrote:You are right. It is up to Big V to decide what they want to do. I find it irritating that so many of you are trying to convince BigV to release everything; trying to tell them how to run their business. Why can't you leave it alone?

So you find it irritating that other's express their opinion of wanting rereleases? Both sides are trying to influence BVG by their comments, it's not only those who are for rereleases that are trying to influence. I think if we counted up the posts there are more posts against rereleases than there are posts for rereleases ... mainly because there is a small outspoken group against rereleases. And if you look at the posts it's mainly those who are against rereleases that express that those who are for them should not try to tell BVG how to run their business.

tink (185739646) wrote:there has been name calling in here calling players greedy etc.

People on both sides have called players greedy. Some of those who don't want rereleases call those who do greedy because they want what they want without working for it. Some of those who are for rereleases call those who are against rereleases greedy because they want to be one of the "elite" that has the few of the old items. It's not just one side or the other side that is guilty of this.

I guess i'm greedy in away. Just for the fact that I spent years getting where I am today and I just don't think others should come into game and have it just like that but for someone else to come in here and call us greedy because we don't want re-releases, and in turn they're being just as greedy for wanting them. Well that just doesn't set well with me.

There's no reason in the world that someone needs to come in game and have it all right away. They'll get their chance just like the rest of us. Bvg made the comment they might make some lookalikes. I think that should be good enough for anyone who doesn't care about collecting. Unless it's the fact that they want it because it's so high in value but most say that's not why they want re-releases. So I think lookalikes should be good enough for them. The older stuff needs to stay where it's at. That way the ones that play to collect can continue to play the way they want. And the ones that just like to decorate and socialize can do just that.