Hopefully Gary can get a look at that too??? Hm?? [/quote]

That would be nice if I didn't have to see someone quote voodoos, mommie dearest or family affair. [/quote]

Thats very interesting Mr Samberg .....Because the rest of the people you have listed ...Think the same about
you i would think ....Also i am not a betting man ...But on this occasion. I would bet the barn that you are on the top of there list ?[/quote]

I hope I am.[/quote]

You don`t need to hope ........Thats for sure ?

Good.

THE VOODOOS (183504146) wrote:You wrong me ....However it would be nice if i am on the top of your list as well ?

You would have to try harder to make the top 5, perhaps?

It really is too bad that feature isn't available NOW.
As in...right now!!

THE VOODOOS (183504146) wrote:I love to fish. But I was referring to your futile attempt at chumming the waters.

You wrong me ....However it would be nice if i am on the top of your list as well ?[/quote][/quote]

I don't know you, but you've already reached the top of mine [/quote]

Well i have seen your comments .....For me i would rather have ten comments ...That are worth something
That fifty that say nothing ?[/quote]

I'm crushed!!

Not.

Samberg (185737325) wrote:Good.

You seem very pleased with yourself ...Mr Samberg ....?

Moxii (105074356) wrote:It really is too bad that feature isn't available NOW.
As in...right now!!

lol...10 minutes ago I had no list. I do now!

THE VOODOOS (183504146) wrote:

Samberg (185737325) wrote:

Sooz (112570178) wrote:The quoting feature is just as annoying.

Hopefully Gary can get a look at that too??? Hm??

That would be nice if I didn't have to see someone quote voodoos, mommie dearest or family affair.

Thats very interesting Mr Samberg .....Because the rest of the people you have listed ...Think the same about
you i would think ....Also i am not a betting man ...But on this occasion. I would bet the barn that you are on the top of there list ?

Is there a better place to be? You say this like it is a bad thing! lol

I am.

I'd be more pleased if I could use ignore right now though.

Dr Gomps (113025949) wrote:

THE VOODOOS (183504146) wrote:I love to fish. But I was referring to your futile attempt at chumming the waters.

You wrong me ....However it would be nice if i am on the top of your list as well ?

[/quote]

I don't know you, but you've already reached the top of mine [/quote]

Well i have seen your comments .....For me i would rather have ten comments ...That are worth something
That fifty that say nothing ?[/quote]

I'm crushed!!

Not.[/quote]

Dont be so ....Sit down have a cup of tea ...And think of something intresting to post ..?

SL BeeBee (103384668) wrote:

Moxii (105074356) wrote:It really is too bad that feature isn't available NOW.
As in...right now!!

lol...10 minutes ago I had no list. I do now!

Ha Ha!!! I'm like you...I'm nosy and want to read it all.
BUT...there comes a point where certain folks just have NOTHING to add.
I have a few on my list...not that many yet. I'm sure the list will grow given some time

Samberg (185737325) wrote:I am.

I'd be more pleased if I could use ignore right now though.

Are you sure about that?

Really? Truly?

I know you are but what am I?

Profound questions?

Moxii (105074356) wrote:

SL BeeBee (103384668) wrote:

Moxii (105074356) wrote:It really is too bad that feature isn't available NOW.
As in...right now!!

lol...10 minutes ago I had no list. I do now!

Ha Ha!!! I'm like you...I'm nosy and want to read it all.
BUT...there comes a point where certain folks just have NOTHING to add.
I have a few on my list...not that many yet. I'm sure the list will grow given some time

My list had 4 but bvg took care of one of them for me. They're so nice!

Nyx (12531218) wrote:

Samberg (185737325) wrote:I am.

I'd be more pleased if I could use ignore right now though.

Are you sure about that?

Really? Truly?

I know you are but what am I?

Profound questions?

I'm rubber you're glue whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you!

I need to go back and read again.....ya lost me.

Moxii (105074356) wrote:

SL BeeBee (103384668) wrote:

Moxii (105074356) wrote:It really is too bad that feature isn't available NOW.
As in...right now!!

lol...10 minutes ago I had no list. I do now!

Ha Ha!!! I'm like you...I'm nosy and want to read it all.
BUT...there comes a point where certain folks just have NOTHING to add.
I have a few on my list...not that many yet. I'm sure the list will grow given some time

Some people just have nothing to add is right.

And personally I'd prefer it if people feel that way about me (which is fine) to do the same.

Samberg (185737325) wrote:I am.

I'd be more pleased if I could use ignore right now though.

Well we don t need to wait for that ....I will not come into your post again ...So please could you do the same for me ? .....Is that not a fair deal ?.....Well i am the one that gets more of a benefit from that arrangement..?`

Is it possible I could be that lucky?

THE VOODOOS (183504146) wrote:

Samberg (185737325) wrote:I am.

I'd be more pleased if I could use ignore right now though.

Well we don t need to wait for that ....I will not come into your post again ...So please could you do the same for me ? .....Is that not a fair deal ?.....Well i am the one that gets more of a benefit from that arrangement..?`

The problem with that is you usually like to have about 5 completely ridiculous threads going all at once on the first page. <this is done by the constant bumping of your own threads when no one wants to comment in them>