You are not logged in. Viewing as Guest
Sooz (112570178) wrote:THE VOODOOS (183504146) wrote:You wrong me ....However it would be nice if i am on the top of your list as well ?
You would have to try harder to make the top 5, perhaps?
Wikkd Mistress (114548862) wrote:THE VOODOOS (183504146) wrote:Samberg (185737325) wrote:I am.
I'd be more pleased if I could use ignore right now though.
Well we don t need to wait for that ....I will not come into your post again ...So please could you do the same for me ? .....Is that not a fair deal ?.....Well i am the one that gets more of a benefit from that arrangement..?`
The problem with that is you usually like to have about 5 completely ridiculous threads going all at once on the first page. <this is done by the constant bumping of your own threads when no one wants to comment in them>
Nyx (12531218) wrote:Wikkd Mistress (114548862) wrote:Samberg (185737325) wrote:I am.
I'd be more pleased if I could use ignore right now though.
Well we don t need to wait for that ....I will not come into your post again ...So please could you do the same for me ? .....Is that not a fair deal ?.....Well i am the one that gets more of a benefit from that arrangement..?`
The problem with that is you usually like to have about 5 completely ridiculous threads going all at once on the first page. <this is done by the constant bumping of your own threads when no one wants to comment in them>
Wikkd Mistress (114548862) wrote:THE VOODOOS (183504146) wrote:Samberg (185737325) wrote:I am.
I'd be more pleased if I could use ignore right now though.
Well we don t need to wait for that ....I will not come into your post again ...So please could you do the same for me ? .....Is that not a fair deal ?.....Well i am the one that gets more of a benefit from that arrangement..?`
The problem with that is you usually like to have about 5 completely ridiculous threads going all at once on the first page. <this is done by the constant bumping of your own threads when no one wants to comment in them>
Robot (185180932) wrote:The question marks make me laugh. I'm sorry I must chime in here as to the lurking I've been doing ?
Robot (185180932) wrote:The question marks make me laugh. I'm sorry I must chime in here as to the lurking I've been doing ?
Moxii (105074356) wrote:Robot (185180932) wrote:The question marks make me laugh. I'm sorry I must chime in here as to the lurking I've been doing ?
You have a better sense of humor than most?
They annoy me to no end?
Wikkd Mistress (114548862) wrote:Robot (185180932) wrote:The question marks make me laugh. I'm sorry I must chime in here as to the lurking I've been doing ?
There are no questions here?
THE VOODOOS (183504146) wrote:Wikkd Mistress (114548862) wrote:THE VOODOOS (183504146) wrote:
I'd be more pleased if I could use ignore right now though.
Well we don t need to wait for that ....I will not come into your post again ...So please could you do the same for me ? .....Is that not a fair deal ?.....Well i am the one that gets more of a benefit from that arrangement..?`
The problem with that is you usually like to have about 5 completely ridiculous threads going all at once on the first page. <this is done by the constant bumping of your own threads when no one wants to comment in them>
Nyx (12531218) wrote:
This is because no one really likes The Riddler? Or not?
Reply hazy try again?
KrAZE (175801908) wrote:So Many Questions, that need to be put into statements.
Nyx (12531218) wrote:KrAZE (175801908) wrote:So Many Questions, that need to be put into statements.
Questions are where its at?
Samberg (185737325) wrote:I am totally confused? I think I need to post about one hundred nonsensical posts? While adding random question marks? For no real reason perhaps? I think that would be fun?
I has no pancake mix?